With the death of Kim Jong-il, all the major media networks now
have the flashing “Breaking News” banners flashing and are talking about how
South Korea is now on “heightened alert.” But before we let the paranoia-loving
news networks get to our heads, it’s important to analyze the death of Kim
Jong-il in the large scheme of things.
To start with, Kim Jong-il was an evil person and there is no
question that the world is a much better place without him. Throughout his
rule, the man defied numerous global outcries about the mass starvation in his
country and instead decided to focus on building his arsenal of nuclear
weapons. Even though the passing of Kim Jong-il is being taken as good news (as
it should be, with people comparing him to Bin Laden and Gadhafi on Twitter),
some people argue that things might get even worse under the apparent
successor, one of Kim Jong-il’s sons: Kim Jong-un.
When Kim Jong-il first took power, the North Korean economy was
already in shambles and many anticipated that the military was going to take
control over the state. This did not take place and Kim Jong-il managed to
centralize the state around him until his death. The circumstances that Kim
Jong-un is now taking power under are eerily similar to the conditions under
which his father took power. However, the results are likely to be different.
According to Chung Young Tae of the Korea Institute of National Unification,
there is a “big possibility that a power
struggle may happen (in North Korea.”
No matter who might emerge as North Korea’s leader, the fact
remains that North Korea is in an absolutely terrible economic position. It has
come to a point where the North Korean government has increased its
interactions with the international community, with the goal of seeking food.
Over the course of the past few months, there have been “behind-the-scenes diplomatic
contacts“ between North Korea and the United States. Word is that
the United States will be announcing a significant donation of food to North
Korea this week and that an agreement by North Korea to suspend its uranium
enrichment program will likely follow.
My prediction is that this current economic instability, along
with the now high possibility of political instability, will eventually lead to
the failure of the North Korean state. Often misunderstood by the media, there
has always been an intention from both Korean sides to reunite, but the problem
has consisted in acknowledging and settling their differences. The failure of
the North Korean state would hasten this process. However, a classmate and
friend of mine, Junseo Lee, raises an excellent question in the previous post
as to what would happen if North Korea did become a failed state. Lee asks: “…if North Korea becomes a
failed state, who will claim legitimacy over those lands? China? Russia? Or
South Korea?” I argue that any efforts from China or Russia to
claim this territory is unlikely and that South Korea would in a way “absorb”
the North, making for the reunification of the Korean nation.
But there also certain complications that arise with the
possibility of reunification. For example, the mere economic disparity is
striking. Recent data shows that North Korea’s GDP was estimated at $40
million, compared with the prosperous South Korea, with an estimated GDP of
$1.138 trillion. Should the two states reunite into one nation, there is the
possibility of a mass exodus of people living in the North to the South. There
is no obvious South Korean plan for such a possibility and this would pose a
huge problem for the nation.
Despite these complications, the prospects of Korean
reunification would create a powerful, democratic, regional power. This would
be good for the United States, as it would help counter-balance the Chinese.
But it’s important to point out that the failure of the Korean state and
possible reunification is not something that is imminent today or tomorrow, it
is likely to take years.
I simply argue that the current North Korean state, especially
in the context of a likely power struggle, will not be able to survive for that
much longer and will likely fail. It is my hope and argument that this will
eventually lead to the reunification of the Korean state, and the reunification
of the Korean people.
No comments:
Post a Comment